Neighbour-colour map
Assign three labels so every listed neighbouring pair differs, then justify the minimum with a triangle.
Adult planning suggestion: about 6–9 · Logic & rule checking · Shape & spatial thinking · Cooperation & communication
- Players
- Pairs
- Time
- 12–18 minutes
- Materials and quantities
- One six-region graph, three labelled colour pencils and a neighbour audit table per pair.
Thirty pupils: fifteen pairs; checker and colourer swap after a complete audit.
Prepare
Use regions A–F with neighbour pairs AB, AC, BC, BD, CD, CE, DF and EF. A line means the two regions share the relevant boundary; a mere corner touch in an invented drawing does not add a pair. Use labels R, G and B along with colours so the worksheet remains usable in black and white. An adult can read the edge list aloud before the pair begins.
Play
Partners choose labels for regions, then check each of the eight listed pairs. They may revise a label, but must recheck all its incident edges afterward. Do not require every region to have a different colour; non-neighbours may share one. Record a check beside each pair rather than judging whether the whole map looks varied. The aim is a valid assignment, followed by a reason about the number of labels.
Worked example
One valid assignment is A=R, B=G, C=B, D=R, E=R and F=G. AB, AC and BC form a triangle. Its three vertices must all differ, so two labels cannot colour this graph. Since the displayed assignment uses only three, three is enough as well as necessary. This reasoning is about this supplied graph, not a proof of the four-colour theorem.
Finish and check
Finish when all eight pairs are checked and a partner can explain the triangle argument, or after the agreed twelve-minute search period. A different valid three-label assignment is equally acceptable. The answer sheet gives one model, not a prescribed colour preference. If an adult changes the neighbour list, the old minimality explanation may no longer apply and needs rechecking.
Adaptation and practical limits
For thirty pupils use fifteen pairs. One labels while the other reads and checks edges, then exchange roles on a fresh copy. Adult planning suggestion is roughly 6–9, depending on familiarity with pairwise constraints; the reference is mechanism background rather than a tested age claim. Hand-copy the six names and edges. No commercial map, special counters or printer is required.
Aim: Assign three labels so every listed neighbouring pair differs, then justify the minimum with a triangle.
Practice within this activity: Attend to explicit adjacency, revise locally and explain a three-way conflict.
Adult observation: Ask which edge would fail with two labels; do not infer general intelligence from speed.
Mechanism and adaptation: Our version uses proper vertex colouring on explicit adjacency edges. Examples and sheets are separately written; the earliest inventor is not established here.
Reference checked 25 October 2026: CS Unplugged · Graph Colouring — Related mechanism: adjacent regions require different colours; our six-node graph, triangle check and sheets are separate. No source artwork is reused.
Goals describe observable activity choices, not measured long-term gains or institutional endorsement.
Free alternatives: Use paper or clean reused cardboard and a pencil. Copy the supplied diagrams and tables by hand; no specialist kit or purchase is needed.
Printable materials
Preview at 100% scale, with browser headers and footers off. Cut with suitable help. Keep host keys separate. This is a manual tabletop kit, not an online opponent, automatic judge or solver.
Player neighbour graph
Three labels R/G/B; listed neighbours must differ, non-neighbours may match.
Player edge audit
| Pair | First label | Second label | Different? |
|---|---|---|---|
| AB | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| AC | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| BC | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| BD | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| CD | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| CE | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| DF | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| EF | ____ | ____ | ____ |
Why are two labels insufficient? ____________________
Host / teacher checked example · separate
Thirty pupils: fifteen pairs; checker and colourer swap after a complete audit.
One six-region graph, three labelled colour pencils and a neighbour audit table per pair.
Keep this answer page separate. Read the full web rules and preview materials before leading; allow pauses, passing and supported writing.
| Region | One valid label |
|---|---|
| A | R |
| B | G |
| C | B |
| D | R |
| E | R |
| F | G |
A/B/C are mutually adjacent: at least3. A checked3-label model is enough, so minimum3 for this graph only.